Making government more efficient

Print Article

This is not an endorsement or a criticism of the three sitting Kootenai County commissioners.

It is simply an observation and a recommendation.

The observation: Our form of county government is inefficient.

The recommendation: Look again at a more efficient form of county government.

Both the observation and recommendation are nothing new. But sticking with an old system that falls further and further behind in effectiveness isnít getting county residents anywhere. So at the very least, letís shed some new light on this somewhat familiar topic.

Kootenai County residents elect three commissioners whose primary responsibilities are serving as the countyís taxing authority, as the countyís contracting body and as chief administrators of public funds. They oversee a budget that is approaching $90 million annually. The reality is, a preponderance of meetings, getting bogged down in daily administrative tasks and coping with interdepartmental issues prevent the three commissioners from operating as efficiently and effectively as they could ó and as citizens deserve.

Letís take just a quick look at meetings. According to county records, commissioners attended 232 clerked meetings, 21 indigent hearings, 77 executive sessions and 47 community development meetings through August this year, with meetings generally lasting one to three hours. That doesnít include individual commissioner meetings with citizens, department personnel or various advisory boards. A fair estimate is that each commissioner attends 20 meetings a week ó or 1,000 a year. That simply canít be the best way to manage.

Twenty years ago, an in-depth study recommended a commissioner-manager form of government, with all six department heads being appointed rather than elected. In 2005, an appointed citizens committee dug deeply into county government and came away with a detailed, thoughtful proposal: Move to a five-member, part-time board with a full-time professional administrator. Continue citizensí electing sheriff and prosecuting attorney but appoint the other department heads (treasurer, assessor, clerk and coroner). And finally, in 2012, a ballot measure to streamline Kootenai Countyís form of government went before voters and failed. The status quo remains today.

But should it? If a more efficient form of government could be introduced at no additional cost to taxpayers, would that be worth considering in light of strong population growth and increasingly complex challenges? Or is this issue simply a non-starter?

Sound off. Write a letter to the editor or comment on cdapress.com.

Print Article

Read More Editorial

Public art worthy of your attention

September 21, 2018 at 5:00 am | Coeur d'Alene Press ĎThe purpose of art is washing the dust of daily life off our souls.í óPablo Picasso You think itís inspiring. He thinks itís dreadful. And she didnít even notice it. Thatís one of the truths ab...

Comments

Read More

Convention wrong kind of invention

September 19, 2018 at 5:00 am | Coeur d'Alene Press If a modern-day constitutional convention were to take place, the door would be held wide open for a crumb of potential wisdom and a wheelbarrow full of insanity to sneak through. Just as the quest ...

Comments

Read More

Sorry, Steve: That is not your house

September 16, 2018 at 5:00 am | Coeur d'Alene Press Make no mistake, Steve Groene suffered. When Joseph Duncan III slaughtered Groeneís ex-wife and two of his children in 2005, certainly a part of him must also have died. Surviving daughter Shasta, t...

Comments

Read More

The gospel according to Joe

September 14, 2018 at 5:00 am | Coeur d'Alene Press Wisdom can leak from unlikely faucets. From Fox News and the White House to CNN and Hollywood, Americans are told what to think and whom to believe. And, yup, this section of the newspaper falls int...

Comments

Read More

Contact Us

(208) 664-8176
215 N. Second St
Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83814

©2018 The Coeur d'Alene Press Terms of Use Privacy Policy
X
X