Assessor appeals ruling - Coeur d'Alene Press: Local News

Assessor appeals ruling

Official feels Board of Equalization caused inequality in values

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 12:00 am

COEUR d'ALENE - Tuesday marked an unusual occurrence for Kootenai County, when the Idaho Board of Tax Appeals held a hearing where the county Assessor's Office appealed a property assessment.

That is, the Assessor's Office appealed a decision the county commissioners made this summer - when they convened as the Board of Equalization - to reduce a citizen's assessed property value.

The commissioners convene as the BOE every year to hear county citizens' appeals of their property value assessments.

This year, the Assessor's Office only appealed two of the BOE's decisions to the state. Not bad, considering the BOE deliberated on more than 100 property assessment appeals this summer.

"There could be several years in a row where (the Assessor's Office) doesn't file any appeals at all," said Assessor Mike McDowell. "The only time that we're really going to file an appeal is if we feel the decision by the Board of Equalization causes serious inequity in values."

At the hearing on Tuesday afternoon, the Assessor's Office challenged the BOE's decision to lower Marty Krupitsky's assessed property value for his Parkside Tower condo from $612,000 to $565,000.

Linda Pike, member of the Idaho Board of Tax Appeals, heard presentations from both the Assessor's Office and Krupitsky in a meeting room of the Ameritel Inn.

Donna Hoppe, county assessor, argued that the BOE had lowered the property assessment "without evidence" to justify doing so.

This is a case where that's particularly ill-advised, Hoppe said, as the lowered assessment alters the uniformity of assessments for the several properties within the same condo tower.

"When the BOE lowered the value, they really disrupted the uniformity of our whole project," Hoppe said. "We're required by law to be uniform."

The BOE's decision was erroneous, Hoppe said. The Assessor's Office had based Krupitsky's property value assessment on the sales of several similar condo units in Parkside Tower, she said.

The assessment was also based on the office's model that a condo unit's value depends on its height and view.

"As the building gets taller, the properties at the top of the tower are worth more and they sell more," Hoppe said, noting Krupitsky's 16th floor location.

Krupitsky said he wouldn't argue about the commissioners lowering his assessment without evidence.

"I will point out that they accepted my position, which was evidence," he said. "That's all the evidence you need, if they bought it."

Krupitsky contended that similar sales are not the only numbers that should determine an assessment value. The condo's initial price was not based on sales, he said.

He didn't dispute that the condo values should be uniform.

"You need to go back and re-evaluate the entire building," Krupitsky said.

Pike said the board of tax appeals will make a decision on the case by May 1 of next year.

More about

More about

More about

  • Discuss

Welcome to the discussion.


  • Oh MY posted at 5:04 pm on Wed, Dec 12, 2012.

    Oh MY Posts: 352

    Randy your such an instigator. Go sit in the corner.

  • Tim Herzog posted at 7:17 am on Wed, Dec 12, 2012.

    Tim Herzog Posts: 359

    Unless I missed it, some facts are not listed here. As a Realtor, I would like to know what the actual sales amount was for the condo in question. As a 100% market value state, properties should be assessed between 90-110% of market value, hopefully the lower figure., according to statute.

    Our current market values are much lower lately due to the amount of foreclosures and short sales being factored in. I personally have appealed property values many times over the years and I do respect the Assessors office for trying to be accurate and fair in their evaluations. With the amount of parcels to assess, their job is not easy and errors can be made. Everyone should look carefully at their assessed value and question it if need be. The Assessors office is always willing to explain their determinations

    I have always argued that true market value means what you actually paid for the particular parcel. If it is much lower than the recorded assessed value of record, that's what your taxes should be based on, at least for the current taxing period.

    The unfortunate part of this equation is that your actual tax amount due is not necessarily reduced by a lower valuation. That amount is determined by all taxing districts budgets along with the County's budget.

    If you ever need to appeal your property valuation, you are required to provide comparable data, basically "sold' information on similar properties. That is difficult unless you have it professionally appraised or enlist a competent Realtor to provide some comparable. I am always willing to answer basic questions.

    Tim Herzog
    Treaty Rock Realty, Inc.

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Not you?||
Logout|My Dashboard