Event center disaster warning - Coeur d'Alene Press: Editorial

Event center disaster warning

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Sunday, July 21, 2013 12:00 am

If Coeur d'Alene is ever going to have an event center, the time isn't now and Riverstone certainly isn't the place.

This week, the city's urban renewal agency, Lake City Development Corp., agreed to fund $10 million toward construction of a multi-purpose event center at Riverstone if North Idaho College, the primary beneficiary of the center, can raise an additional $5 million for the project.

We're stunned that NIC would step so far outside its educational mission as a community college - and beyond the 17-acre corridor it purchased five years ago at a cost of $10 million - to prioritize this ill-conceived project and push it into hyperdrive. And we're disappointed that LCDC, perhaps in political panic mode, would even consider committing almost every future penny it could generate in the River District to such a risky venture.

The Press editorial board has reviewed both feasibility studies on a Riverstone-based event center, the first produced in 2008 by Conventions, Sports & Leisure, International, and the other a two-year-old revision by John Stone, Riverstone's owner. Among the conclusions we've reached:

* Unrealistic booking projections. Regional competition for events, ranging from high school sports to higher profile concerts, already is intense, and it's only going to become more competitive. Spokane offers venues for a multitude of attractions, and the Coeur d'Alene Tribe's event facilities present another established alternative. Further, the University of Idaho is in the process of building a $25 million event center of its own. We see no evidence in either Riverstone study that locals are in any position to compete at that level and bolster the economy.

* Unacceptable risk to taxpayers. Across the country, event centers are losing money - in many cases, in the millions. Given the competitive disadvantages Coeur d'Alene already would face, the chance that taxpayers would be left footing perpetual bills covering losses is irresponsibly high.

* Unacceptable design. Plans for this facility amount to little more than a 4,500-seat pole barn with a little makeup. If something can cost $15 million and still look cheap, designs for this project fit the bill. It would not represent Coeur d'Alene the way we believe the city and its residents deserve to be represented.

What's happening here is clear: NIC is desperate to grab the "free dollars" that would make a project like this possible - urban renewal funds with potentially a very limited shelf life. Depending upon how city elections go this November, the urban renewal agency could be curtailed or even disbanded, but its commitments would have to be honored. LCDC appears eager to make those commitments to assure its continued operation for years to come, even if it's only to make good on old promises.

If there is any future for a Coeur d'Alene event center, some believe it should be privately financed, with the risks and rewards borne by investors, not taxpayers. We'd feel better if a current and objective study could be completed before any serious talk were to continue. Only then should the merits of a project of this scope be seriously considered.

North Idaho College, which was stung by a recent national report showing its students are defaulting on loans at a greater rate than they're graduating, should be fully focused on its academic and professional-technical pursuits, including expanding its PTE program to meet future employment needs.

We strongly urge the NIC Board of Trustees to put a decisive end to its part in the potential disaster that investing heavily in an ugly, offsite event center represents. You've got enough to do preparing your students for life's challenges ahead.

More about

More about

More about

  • Discuss

Welcome to the discussion.

7 comments:

  • CDAforlife posted at 2:33 pm on Fri, Jul 26, 2013.

    CDAforlife Posts: 3

    Why would I want to drive an hour or more away from my home to attend a event when it could be held here? Why would I want to support another city and put money into their community when it could stay here?

    Secondly, Have any of you actually attended a event at NIC's current gym? its smaller than a High School gym and literally falling apart. Our community and students need this facility.

    Coeur d' Alene has been and continues to grow and shine as a destination spot. If an event center large enough was built, I can garantee there would be no competition. Event organizers would jump at the opportunity to set up in Coeur d' Alene vs Spokane. Anyways, we already know that half of Spokane comes over to Coeur d' Alene to get away, not the opposite. I have no doubt that this facility would pay for itself in short order and then continue to pour much needed capital into our community.

     
  • Randy Myers posted at 5:49 am on Mon, Jul 22, 2013.

    Randy Myers Posts: 1635

    I guess it's easy for me to call this an excellent editorial when it highlights the points I have been blogging about.

    This plan is a patchwork partnership designed to kill two birds with one stone. NIC gets a replacement building while the community gets an event center. The problem is that the plan is inferior. Who manages the center ? Why does NIC ALWAYS receive priority in scheduling ? What projections are there that this center of 4500 is even needed with similar (or larger) venues within an hour drive ?

    NIC and community partnerships may be a good thing but this particular one is not.

     
  • Ziggy posted at 1:46 pm on Sun, Jul 21, 2013.

    Ziggy Posts: 1286

    First class editorial. Well thought out, well researched, well done, Press.
    For NIC to have ideas of acting like a four year school is insane. Four year schools won't be what they are in a few years. This is a bad idea from start to finish.

     
  • arius1 posted at 11:22 am on Sun, Jul 21, 2013.

    arius1 Posts: 957

    Kudos Dan, Thanks for voicing the concern of many if not most of us regarding this issue. The LCDC needs to be shut down, or revamped so voters/taxpayers have more say in where and how OUR money is spent.

     
  • Spikey posted at 10:28 am on Sun, Jul 21, 2013.

    Spikey Posts: 387

    Finally, the voice of reason. Thank you Mr. Patrick and keep it up. Like partaking of a gourmet meal, once isn't enough! These facts must be reiterated many times. Yes, political upheaval is in the wind and the GOB's are in a swivet. Of all the questionable LCDC acts, this one is the straw that will break the taxpayers back.

     
  • concernedcitizen posted at 8:28 am on Sun, Jul 21, 2013.

    concernedcitizen Posts: 2530

    Oh My Gosh! I cannot believe this is in the CdA Press. This is the most accurate portrayal I have ever read coming from this paper concerning the internal workings of the LCDC and NIC..

    GREAT JOB!

     
  • Will Penny posted at 4:43 am on Sun, Jul 21, 2013.

    Will Penny Posts: 333

    Good job Press. I think you have nailed it!

     
default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
Not you?||
Logout|My Dashboard

Stocks

Stocks