VISION: 1 meeting, two perspectives

Print Article

I am writing this letter in response to the criticism of the CDA 2030 workshops that was expressed by a rural property owner. I attended this same workshop and currently I have chosen to live in the city of Coeur d’Alene while my house is being built outside of the city in Kootenai County.

I disagree that the moderator at the workshop refused to define Greater Coeur d’Alene. Instead, Mr. Steven Ames asked the workshop participants to define it for themselves. For me personally that includes not only Coeur d’Alene, but Post Falls, Hayden, Rathdrum and other surrounding areas. For someone else that may include all of rural Kootenai county. I don’t think you can create a vision for Coeur d’Alene that only involves the boundaries of the city as we are all connected by where we socialize, work and shop. That is, I may shop in Hayden, go to church in Coeur d’Alene and have really good friends who live in Post Falls; this is what defines my community. However, this is different for each individual and that was the point that was made at the workshop.

I think it is important to understand what was done at these workshops. We were asked to work together in small groups and individually to give our ideas on what we see as the future challenges for our area and what some of the solutions may be. It was a great community building process, as everyone had a voice in the mix. There were no right or wrong answers.

It is my opinion that the CDA 2030 project’s purpose is not to create a plan like the recent ULUC, but instead to create a vision for what all the citizens of the area would like to see for the greater Coeur d’Alene region and then reference this vision to guide the plans, decisions and actions of community organizations. I take offense that some of these visions for greater Coeur d’Alene violated private property rights. People are entitled to their opinions. We weren’t creating law, we were brainstorming. The workshops are the opinion of the citizens that participated which was open for ALL to attend.

If the writer of the letter is concerned about participation from other rural Kootenai County residents then she should have encouraged her fellow neighbors to attend the workshops. The one she attended was the first one. There were two more after that one. I believe the CDA 2030 visioning process is very important in preparing our region for the future. I encourage all citizens interested in being involved and having their voice heard to attend the CDA 2030 Visioning Summit on Nov. 16. More information can be found at cda2030.org.

ROBYN BRUNS

Coeur d’Alene

Print Article

Read More Letters to the Editor

SOCIALISM: Further thoughts

May 19, 2019 at 5:00 am | Coeur d'Alene Press My letter, printed in The Press on May 8, tried to illustrate that there are elements of socialism and/or communism woven into the fabric of our society and culture. I did not mention it, but the sam...

Comments

Read More

ALZHEIMER’S: Call to action

May 19, 2019 at 5:00 am | Coeur d'Alene Press There are more than 26,000 Idahoans living with Alzheimer’s disease and more than 85,000 family members and friends are acting as unpaid caregivers. At the beginning of April, I joined fellow Idaho...

Comments

Read More

SENTENCE: Well done, your honor

May 19, 2019 at 5:00 am | Coeur d'Alene Press Kudos to Judge John Mitchell for giving the drunk driver prison time. He is so right about sending the right kind of message to other drunk drivers. I have seen the aftermath of what drunk drivers d...

Comments

Read More

RAYDEANE: A life-changer

May 19, 2019 at 5:00 am | Coeur d'Alene Press Today, I am writing you about an opinion piece that was published Wednesday in the Coeur d’Alene Press called “judge not” by Melinda Cadwallader. It was regarding an article written in Live Well CDA ...

Comments

Read More

Contact Us

(208) 664-8176
215 N. Second St
Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83814

©2019 The Coeur d'Alene Press Terms of Use Privacy Policy
X
X