Research: MLP: Yes, plurals are fun (and fickle)

Print Article

To her fans, few and deluded as they may be, the contrite Mrs. Language Person extends her dubious apologies. Today’s offering is neither her own nor particularly illuminating. No, Dear Readers, today she seeks merely to entertain and be done with it, off to nurse another grueling headache (Snitty Old Bitties are naturally prone to them, you see).

So without further ado she brings to you a popular ode of old, one misattributed yet reproduced by Harvard-educated English teacher, prolific author of “Crazy English,” and 1989 Punster of the Year, Richard Lederer (more on its origin follows).

•••

Ode to English Plurals

We’ll begin with a box, and the plural is boxes, but the plural of ox should be oxen, not oxes.

Then one fowl is a goose, but two are called geese, yet the plural of moose should never be meese,

You may find a lone mouse or a whole nest of mice, but the plural of house is houses, not hice.

If the plural of man is always called men, why shouldn’t the plural of pan be called pen?

The cow in the plural may be cows or kine, but a bow if repeated is never called bine, and the plural of vow is vows, never vine.

If I speak of a foot and you show me your feet, and I give you a boot would a pair be called beet?

If one is a tooth, and a whole set are teeth, why shouldn’t the plural of booth be called beeth?

If the singular’s this and the plural is these, should the plural of kiss ever be nicknamed keese?

Then one may be that and three would be those, yet hat in the plural would never be hose, and the plural of cat is cats, not cose.

We speak of a brother, and also of brethren, but though we say mother, we never say methren,

Then the masculine pronouns are he, his and him, but imagine the feminine she, shis and shim.

So the English, I think, you all will agree, is the queerest language you ever did see.

•••

“Kine,” you may have asked? Why yes; kine is the archaic plural of cow, from the Middle English “kyn.” And that brings us to our hint of this ode’s earlier o-ri-gin.

So Dear Reader, lest you retain that Hollywood-inspired misimpression that the 19th century was all punctilious stuffiness punctuated only by frustrated romances in Jane Austen style, note: “Ode to English Plurals” — its author unknown — has been found published in newspapers of the late 1800s. Those English neckties and corsets couldn’t have been knotted too tightly.

•••

Mrs. Language Person and her nurse-secretary, Sholeh Patrick, are columnists for the Hagadone News Network. Contact them at Sholeh@cdapress.com.

Print Article

Read More Sholeh Patrick

Research: Is your writing logical?

July 11, 2019 at 5:00 am | Coeur d'Alene Press If you’re a doctor or nurse, you get it too — that involuntary inner shudder when someone in a social situation says, “I have this pain …” Asking for cocktail party diagnoses is not cool. It puts the...

Comments

Read More

Opinion: North Idaho drivers head wrong way on kindness

July 09, 2019 at 5:00 am | Coeur d'Alene Press With family in several countries “across the pond,” as the Brits say, I’ve learned that all drivers aren’t created equal. There is a certain driving culture unique to each place — a set of expectatio...

Comments

Read More

Playing with fire? Then do it right

July 04, 2019 at 5:00 am | Coeur d'Alene Press Happy birthday, America! The weather is set to be just about perfect. Today we’ll consume 150 million hot dogs, 700 pounds of chicken, and more beer than any other holiday, according to Wallethub’s...

Comments

Read More

Research: Pet lessons from the fiery Fourth

July 02, 2019 at 5:00 am | Coeur d'Alene Press I wish I’d written this six years ago. If we’d been better informed, little Liebling the cat would still be scampering about the house. Cuddling at bedtime. Playfully getting underfoot. July is Lo...

Comments

Read More

Contact Us

(208) 664-8176
215 N. Second St
Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83814

©2019 The Coeur d'Alene Press Terms of Use Privacy Policy
X
X